صفحه نخست
پیوندهای روزانه

سه شنبه 29 بهمن 1392 ساعت 7:6 ق.ظ
Flash mob mentality The definition of hell is being condescended to by idiots.It will probably be msnbc's chris matthews and contessa brewer sneering at you for all of eternity for not believing in evolution. Roughly onethird of my 2007 book,"Godless:The church of liberalism,"Is an attack on darwinian evolution.I presented the arguments of all the luminaries in the field, from the retarded richard dawkins to the brilliant francis crick, and disputed them. But apparently liberals didn't want to argue back.In a onehour interview with me on"Godless,"Matthews didn't ask me a single question about the subject.He doesn't even know what evolution is. Just a year later, at a 2008 republican presidential candidates debate, matthews asked for a show of hands of who believed in evolution.No discussion permitted!That might allow scientific facts to escape into the world. Evolution is the only subject that is discussed exclusively as a"Do you believe? "Question with yesorno answers.How about putting mikes in front of liberal candidatesAnddemanding,"Do you believe in the bible yes or no? " "Is an unborn baby human yes or no? "And"Do you believe teenagers should have sex yes or no? " This is the flash mob method of scientific inquiry.Liberals quickly surround and humiliate anyone who disagrees with them.Now that republican presidential candidate rick perry has said there are"Gaps"In the Louis Vuitton Men theory of evolution, we're in for another round of factfree mocking of fundamentalist nuts. In fact, however, advances in science have discredited darwin's theory of evolution.Consider one small slice of the mountain of evidence disproving this mystery religion from the victorian http://www.on-now.com/ age. Advances in microbiology reveal infinitely complex mechanisms requiring hundreds of parts working together at once complex cellular structures, dna, bloodclotting mechanisms, molecules, and the cell's tiny flagellum and cilium.Darwin's theory was that life on earth began with singlecelled life forms, which by great deals on Handbags random mutation, sex and death, would pass on the desirable mutations, and this process would lead to the creation of new species. The test darwin set for his theory was this: "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. " Thanks to advances in microscopes, thousands of such complex mechanisms have been found.Darwin had to explain only simple devices, such as beaks and gills.If he were able to come back and peer through a modern microscope to see the inner workings of a cell, he would instantly abandon his own theory. It is a mathematical impossibility, for example, that all 30 to 40 parts of the cell's flagellum could arise at once by random mutation.Nor would each of the parts individually make an organism more fit to survive and reproduce, which is the lynchpin of the whole contraption. The more we have learned about molecules, cells and dna a body of knowledge some refer to as"Science"The more preposterous darwin's theory has become. Harvard population biologist richard lewontin said the darwiniacs tolerate"Unsubstantiated justso stories"Of evolution and ignore"The patent absurdity of some of its constructs"Because they are committed to coming up with a theory that excludes god. "We cannot,"Lewontin said,"Allow a divine foot in the door. " Maybe if we called the intelligent designer"Louis vuitton"To avoid frightening the godphobics, they'd finally admit the truth:Modern science has disproved darwinian evolution. Ann coulter, a political analyst and attorney, is a columnist for human events. We moderate comments.Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership.By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information. While most comments will be posted if they are ontopic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective.We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can.Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers. We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely.We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers. We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper.A few things we won't tolerate:Personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity(Including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, Louis Vuitton Handbags Sale incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING.Don't include urls to web sites. We do not edit comments.They are either approved or deleted.We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article.In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation. We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly. We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions.But these suggestions should be sent via email.To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction.Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.


برچسب ها: partydressess ,
(0 نظر)
(1210 بازدید)
نوشته شده توسط partydressess partydressess
  بازدید کل: 25368   بازدید امروز: 18   بازدید یک ماه اخیر: 87